Search for: "B CHOICE LIMITED" Results 1 - 20 of 4,608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2014, 5:34 am by Cari Rincker
  The post Choice of Business Entity Blog Series: The “D/B/A” appeared first on Rincker Law. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:39 am
As a corporate lawyer, I have been asked by current and prospective business owners whether this new type of entity was the right choice of entity for them. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Kari D. Boyle
This is different than arbitrarily limiting choices. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:31 pm by Greg Mersol
The Bottom Line:  The statute of limitations and choice of law may be sources of conflict that render a case unsuitable for class action treatment. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:27 pm by Béligh Elbalti
[Since Y1 is a Bahraini limited liability company and Y2 and Y3, who are partners in Y1, are Bahraini nationals,] it is not permissible to waive the jurisdiction of the Bahraini courts, which retain jurisdiction over the [present] dispute. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:33 am
Inability to communicate any choice made was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:35 am by Carolyn Elefant
” In states that do not authorize formation of a “public benefits corporation” (or where a public benefits structure is not an appropriate business choice), a socially conscious company may opt “Certified B-Corporation” status through a third-party certification process. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:54 am by Benjamin P. Edwards
I say partial control because most 403(b) retirement plans only allow faculty to pick from a limited menu of options. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm by davidmginsberg
But I support the age limitations imposed by the Obama administration. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 3:44 pm by Francis Pileggi
(internal footnotes omitted) Delaware Choice-of-Law Policy and the Exception in Restatement (Second) of Conflicts, Section 187(2)(b) It remains well-settled that: Delaware courts will honor a contractually-designed choice-of-law provision so long as the jurisdiction selected bears some material relationship to the transaction. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm by James Hamilton
Section 16(b) is a statute of limitations for those who file the form demanded by Section 16(a), he posited, adding that there is no statute of limitations in 16(b) for those who do not. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Inter Partes Patent Reexamination is Not Always the Best Choice In the case of Inventio AG v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under Ranked-Choice Voting, Candidate B (now the person with the fewest votes) would be eliminated, and her 30 votes would be reallocated among the remaining candidates. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:12 pm by Andrew Perlman
A review of Rule 8.5 (Choice of Law) yields no clear answer. [read post]